Search List show here

Back to news

22 February 2021

IMYC2020 Rubrics

Our IMYC2020 Rubrics and Learning Advice are now ready!

Each document contains Rubrics and Learning Advice for each age group (MY1, MY2 and MY3) to allow you to track progress within and over three years. Assessment is integral to the Process to Facilitate Learning, so rubrics should be discussed as part of learning.

Assessment is integral to the Process to Facilitate Learning and therefore rubrics should be discussed as part of learning. Rubrics can be used as a tool for tracking individual and class/cohort progress in skills learning. This can inform future teaching and learning, differentiation, or curriculum decision-making.

Rubrics can be used before, during and after learning. After learning, students may be encouraged to read the rubric in detail to self-assess and identify where they have been successful and areas they need to work on.

In the case of using the Teacher Rubrics with students, you may simplify the language or develop alternatives with your students using familiar vocabulary. Asking learners to put the rubric in their own words can be a useful learning activity as it will reveal whether they comprehend what they are aiming for. Pairs could ‘translate’ one level of the rubric and then work with other pairs to complete the rubric. Whole class agreement is then needed, and it is recommended that teachers in the same year or grade level share and discuss any co-created student rubrics to identify anomalies.

It is not recommended to adapt or change the Teacher Rubrics for the IMYC. The criterion-referenced rubrics are provided to reduce subjective judgments or those made based on peer comparisons. The rubrics promote consistency of assessment and support teachers in making professional inferences and judgments. Task-based success criteria can be developed with students in addition to the provided rubric giving a content/activity focus if needed. This should not be in the form of a rubric to avoid confusing between Learning Goals and task expectations.

Back to news

15 February 2021

Guest Blog: Celebrating change as an IPC Trainer

As an international trainer for the IPC, this year has been full of changes, just like so many teachers in schools around the world. We have changed the way we train from face to face to an online, blended course, and on reflection, it’s been really positive. Along with this change, the IPC has seen many changes as part of the IPC2020 review that is now supporting and benefiting many teachers and schools worldwide.

The IPC encourages learners to be globally competent, future-ready, socially conscious and motivated to positively contribute within a local and/or global context. This is done by using the new goals organised by strands, showing vertical progression for all learners.

One of the changes as part of IPC2020 is that the Learning Goals of the International Curriculum are presented as a matrix or grid, intended to support teachers in knowing where learners’ development has come from and/or where they are going to. The grid format indicates the sequence of progression through the mileposts of the international curriculum, within an area of learning, while demonstrating what progress looks like throughout.

Another element that I want to celebrate is that the assessment for improving learning toolkit has been updated. The mastering is the aim for all learners, along with a new column of innovating. Remember that the aim of rubrics is to improve learning and support you as a teacher.

The last change I want to mention is the brilliant new SDG Challenge Series that aims to further develop learner agency and global competence by providing exciting and relevant challenges linked to the Sustainable Development Goals. The SDG Challenge Series outlines global issues for learners to respond to, requiring problem-solving and applying all the Personal Learning Goals.

Like our learners, we are continually reflecting on our service and responding to your feedback on the IPC platform or via Twitter. We looked at the Milepost 1 units to make them even better through the constant self-evaluation, and we are currently reviewing units in Milepost 2 & 3, so watch this space!

Back to news

3 February 2021

Guest Blog: IEYC – What difference has it made to our School?

When I was invited to write for this blog I thought I’d like to focus on what has been remarkable since we started working with IEYC. Snapshots of our children and their parents enjoying the Entry and Exit Points, teachers discussing the best use of our environment to support children’s learning instantly came to mind. Though trivial, they represent what we wanted to accomplish and how this curriculum has made a difference in our school community.

The British School strives for excellence, for caring and motivating every pupil to realise their full potential. Play and how it underpins both development and learning, for pupils and teachers alike, has challenged us to design new creative learning that meet individual needs, supported by targeted interventions whenever appropriate and within a supportive environment. 

We started the IEYC implementation by familiarising teachers with the curriculum content and specific guidelines, not only to allow them to appropriately assess interventions and activities but also to coherently, consistently and confidently incorporate them into their teaching practice. This was facilitated by a workshop with open-ended discussions followed by pilot-testing some units in the first year, and an increased number of units in the subsequent years.

Each Learning Unit starts with a wow factor’ that captures learners’ engagement and leads them to explore the topic – a dress-up day, a visit by a character (e.g., a dinosaur) or parents coming in for an activity. The overarching theme is carefully linked to real-life experiences and learners are challenged to develop critical and creative skills that culminate in meaningful and exciting outcomes.

Before implementing the IEYC, the learning opportunities of the outdoor environment were little explored. The IEYC opened the classroom doors to including outdoor areas – not only the play area but the entire school environment – in lesson planning and potential inquisitive exploration as learning resources. Viewed as an extension of the classroom, these areas allowed implementing the IEYC through play–based activities and also creating a learning area called Discovery Centre. We wanted to make sure that every child would have access to a curriculum that prepares them to deal with challenging experiences.

During our planning meetings, we also reflected on key issues, such as, What should our pupils learn or be curious about? What can be changed to foster our pupils’ curiosity? In our learner-centred curriculum, teachers’ observing the children’s interests and becoming aware of their developmental needs was a major shift into providing our children with more varied types of self-initiated and free-flow learning opportunities both indoors and outdoors.

The Learning Strands within the IEYC also call for constantly going to different environment and adapting them to the thematic units and to the children’s interests and needs. These changes spark children’s imagination and bring learning to life, and have brought about reduced stress in the classroom, fewer behavioral issues and a higher sense of pride in their learning.

Since we started the e-learning process we have also been in close contact with parents to encourage and support their implementing the same type of approach to activities delivered at home. Concerning EYFS, e-learning has encouraged reflection and discussion on how to co-construct our knowledge and best engage pupils in meaningful e-activities. My quality interaction with my team has played a vital role in supporting them to meet these challenges. We have become stronger as a team and have collaboratively designed videos featuring teachers implementing different activities (circle time songs, morning greetings) that are more humanised, more connected to the teachers’ and the students’ reality – the home as a new context of instruction. We have also introduced virtual meetings to strengthen the teacher-pupil-family bond. Parents have used ClassDojo (the app that is the major facilitator of parent<>teacher/school<>pupil communication) to post videos of their children at task and comment on activity outcomes. They have provided us with very positive feedback that has also led to adjustments in planning the next steps and filling in any learning gaps. The IEYC framework has greatly assisted in contextualizing learning and fostered the school syllabus continuity, connection and family engagement.

Finally, I would like to go back to the title of this article: IEYC – What difference has it made to our school? I am glad to say that the changes brought by this curriculum have evidenced the rich contribution to pupils´ learning and teachers’ constant reflection and constructive criticism.

Enquire now

Find out more about ICA products and services!